Understanding the parental COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A qualitative inquiry

Abstract

This study investigated understanding parental COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Davao City. Through qualitative research methods including in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, the identified key concerns shaping parental attitudes towards vaccination. Safety emerged as a predominant issue, with parents expressing fears about potential side effects and long-term impacts on children's health. Misinformation, particularly through social media, amplified these concerns, underscoring the need for targeted information campaigns in the local language to debunk myths and address specific worries. Cultural and social influences also played pivotal roles in influencing vaccine acceptance and decision-making processes. Policy implications highlighted the importance of balancing public health imperatives with respect for individual autonomy and community beliefs, particularly regarding vaccine mandates and ethical considerations. Future research directions included comprehensive studies and the creation of tools to assess the sustained impact of vaccination on children's health, the effectiveness of communication strategies, and the role of digital media in shaping vaccination attitudes. Comparative analyses across diverse demographic groups within Davao City can further elucidate variations in vaccine hesitancy factors and inform tailored interventions. Ethical considerations surrounding vaccine policies and their implications for parental decision-making and community health outcomes warranted continued exploration. By addressing these gaps, policymakers and healthcare providers can develop targeted interventions to enhance vaccine acceptance and community resilience against COVID-19.